46 Kan. App. 2d 939 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Quick · State v. Fewell · State v. Bishop · 6 Kan. App. 2d 556 - State v. Brown · 151 Ohio App. 3d 208 - State v. Desper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A ruling on a motion in limine is temporary in nature and is subject to revision at trial in light of the evidence that is actually presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“used to invoke a trial judge's inherent power to control proceedings, to exclude inadmissible evidence, and to prevent undue prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not constitute the violation of a constitutional right and is not legally sufficient to support a motion to suppress”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fudge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.