Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 MASSAPPCT 307 - Commonwealth v. Russell

Commonwealth v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2018

20 state decisions

90199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Commissioner v. Engle · Commonwealth v. Latimore · Commonwealth v. Casale · United States v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[flact finders are not required to divorce themselves of common sense, but rather should apply to facts which they find proven such reasonable inferences as are justified in the light of their experience as to the natural inclinations of human beings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There was no evidentiary gap in the Commonwealth's case, merely a question of the weight to be accorded”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.