Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 MICH 83 - Wiley v. Lovely

Wiley v. Lovely’s Empirical Analysis

1881

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
December 1917
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1917

4 state decisions

201881189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson ex dem. Rogers v. Clark · Johnstone v. Scott · Slater v. Breese · Goodenow v. Curtis · Jones v. . Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The grant was not impaired by the omission to record the plat, and it was competent to identify the parcel by parol evidence. . . It is often necessary to resort to such evidence for the purpose of applying the deed to the subject-matter. That part of the description which speaks of the registry of the plat, and is found incorrect, may be rejected without any detriment. Enough is left to satisfy all legal requirements.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““All that certain piece or parcel of land lying and being in the village of Fowlerville, county of Livingston and state of Michigan, and more particularly known and described as follows, to-wit: village lot number seventy-seven (77) of the original plat of the village of Fowlerville, as duly laid out, platted, and recorded in the office of the register of deeds for said county of Livingston.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.