Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 MINN 277 - Triggs v. Jones

Triggs v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
7
states following
January 1968
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 1968

19 state decisions

4018911900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Consequently mere passive inaction or silence which would amount to an implied ratification in favor of third parties, might not amount to that in favor of the agent. ...” This same proposition is given elaborate expression by our Supreme Court in the ease of Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. Smith, supra, (511, 512):”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.