State v. Klitzke’s Empirical Analysis
1891
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 1951
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Worthingham · State v. Nichols · Prindle v. Campbell · State v. Snure
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The ground of the motion to dismiss this appeal is that a notice of appeal does not appear to have been served upon the clerk of the district court. It does appear, however, that a notice of appeal addressed to the attorneys for the state and bearing their admission of service was filed with the clerk of the court. Following the decision in Baberick v. Magner, 9 Minn. 217 (232), we hold that to be a sufficient compliance with the statute. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Archerd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.