46 Misc. 2d 205 - Dudley v. Corbett’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1968
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Frisbie v. Collins · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois · Patterson v. Medberry · Bradford Elec. Light Co. v. Clapper · Simpson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person accused of a crime and produced in the jurisdiction where he is so charged and held under processes legally issued from a Court of that jurisdiction cannot attack the jurisdiction of the Court nor its right to try him because of the manner in which he was produced before that Court. It makes no difference whether it be by force, kidnapping, illegal arrest, abduction, or faulty, incomplete or irregular extradition proceedings. Dudley v. Corbett, 46 Misc.2d 205 , 259 N.Y.S.2d 572, 576-577 (1965), citing Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519 , 72 S.Ct. 509 , 96 L.Ed. 541 ; and Ker v. People of State of Illinois, 119 U.S. 436 , 7 S.Ct. 225 , 30 L.Ed. 421 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fournier v. Roed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.