Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 Neb. 822

Argabright v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1896

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1896-01-21

Tried below before Babcock,' J. Heard on a motion by plaintiff in error to compel the court stenographer of the first judicial district to furnish a transcript of the evidence upon which the case was tried.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1935

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Motion overruled · Decided 1896-01-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ryan, C.

¶1The plaintiff in error has applied ' to this court for an order to compel the reporter of the first judicial district of this state to furnish a transcript of the evidence upon which this cause was tried. We find in the record that, upon an application to Hon. A. H. Babcock, the district judge who presided at said trial, for an order requiring that said evidence be extended without payment, on account of the poverty of the plaintiff in error, said order was refused, but that in that connection it was found that the said reporter, as a condition precedent to making the transcript required of him, had demanded from one of the attorneys of plaintiff in error his fees for making such transcript, but that such payment had been refused. It was ordered, however, that said reporter furnish the required bill of ex-oeptions upon the tender to him of his legal fees for such services. As there has been no attempt to review or comply with the order, plaintiff in error is not entitled to the order asked in this court. Accordingly it is denied.

¶2Motion overruled.

/46/neb/822 · .json · Public domain