Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 N.J. 262 - State v. Mark

State v. Mark’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
7
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably State v. Novembrino (1987), State v. McKnight (1968)

80 state decisions

260196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Weeks v. United States · Ker v. State of California · Henry v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Court has held that the State must make the issuing judge aware of underlying facts which would justify a prudent man in believing that an offense has been or is being committed (State v. Macri, 39 N. J. 250, 257 (1963)) ; but it has also held that the State need not disclose all of its evidence, that trustworthy hearsay is admissible (State v. Burrachio, 39 N. J. 272, 275 (1963)), that the issuing judge’s finding that probable cause existed will be considered as a substantial factor tending to uphold the validity of the warrant, and that his action in issuing it will not be upset on appeal though the matter be viewed as a close one. State v. Zuzulock, 39 N. J. 276, 281 (1963).” 46 N. J. at 273.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Law enforcement is difficult enough, without requiring a police officer to free his mind of clues lying flatly before him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “means less than legal evidence necessary to convict though more than mere naked suspicion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.