Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 N.J. Super. 193 - State v. Bentley

46 N.J. Super. 193 - State v. Bentley’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
January 1987
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1987 · most notably State v. Fritz (1987), State v. Dennis (1964)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

1501957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bogen · 137 Cal. App. 1 - People v. Graves · State v. Merra · Blassengame v. Boyd · 44 N.J. Super. 250 - State v. Kobylarz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A failure of competent counsel in a criminal case to present certain evidence or to advance certain contentions, whether such non-action represent an error of judgment or mere inadvertence, does not constitute denial of due process of law, even though such failure result in a conviction which perhaps might have been avoided. The constitutional requirement is satisfied when the defendant has had the benefit of the advice and guidance of a reputable and competent attorney. [at 203] [7]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a defendant is represented at trial by an attorney, the latter has implied authority to make all necessary decisions on all matters incidental to the management of the case which affect only procedure or remedy as distinguished from the cause of action itself, and the party is bound by such acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.