46 N.J. Super. 222 - Kufta v. Hughson’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 1993
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 10 N.J. Eq. 332 - Johnson v. Hubbell · Cooper v. Colson · New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Town of Harrison · 12 N.J. Eq. 142 - Vanduyne v. Vreeland · Cauco v. Galante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no indication in the New Jersey authorities that the bar of the statute of frauds may be avoided on the theory of estoppel by circumstances which would not qualify as part performance within the cases hereinabove discussed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“dispel the mischief the statute aims at....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.