46 N.J. Super. 454 - State v. Micci’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2006
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Michelson v. United States · Edgington v. United States · Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of Dumont · 35 N.J. Super. 103 - State v. Steensen · 36 N.J. Super. 219 - State v. Gambutti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we glean from the questions by which counsel explored this subject before being interrupted by the definitive exclusionary ruling of the court no clue to any probative relevancy between the subject of inquiry and the issue involved”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“implies a sense of general probity which is the antithesis of criminal tendency or conduct, and which certainly, we think, would imply a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.