Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 N.M. 249 - Yates v. Hawkins

Yates v. Hawkins’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1998

18 state decisions

80194219501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Buck v. Canty · Kershner v. Sganzini · Pace v. Wight · Blackford v. Judith Basin County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The right to repurchase is not a vested property right which cannot be changed by a subsequent act of the Legislature. * * * * * * "Upon the basis of this statement, we do not see how this case can be taken as authority for the proposition that a preference right given to the former owner of the property to repurchase property sold to the State for taxes is in the nature of the same right as an ordinary period of redemption afforded to the former owner to redeem his property before title passes to the State. * * * * * * "* * * Each session of the Legislature could change the method by which a former owner could repurchase land acquired by the State under its delinquent tax law. The Legislature could even abolish any preference right given by a former session if such right or privilege had not been acted upon by a former owner during the life of the statute. * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.