46 Ohio App. 2d 157 - Majnaric v. Majnaric’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. Judges (1978), State v. Rogers (1985)
86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 141 Ohio St. 432 - In Re Kurtzhalz · 40 Ohio App. 2d 129 - Vavrina v. Greczanik · Interstate Equipment Corp. v. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey · Baruch v. Beech Aircraft Corp. · Zig Zag Spring Co. v. Comfort Spring Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[t]he general rule is that when an appeal is taken from the [court] the latter court is divested of jurisdiction, except to take action in aid of the appeal, until the case is remanded to it by the appellate court. Hence, during the pendency of an appeal it is generally held that [a court] is without power * * * to vacate, alter or amend the judgment under Rule 60(B), whether the 60(B) motion is made prior to or after the appeal is taken, except with permission of the appellate court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““* * * Since plaintiff had actual care and control, and sought an order to change schools, there is no conflict between her desires and the court order concerning public versus religious schools, and the issue of freedom of religion. “The defendant, thus, has no standing to raise that constitutional issue, because the constitutional protection is afforded to the person having personal care and control of the children. * * *””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“«* * * ^he appellant [to] move the appellate court, for good cause, to remand the matter to the trial court for a hearing on the motion to vacate without divesting the appellate court of jurisdiction to hear the pending appeal if it is not rendered moot by the hearing on the motion to vacate,” Majnaric v. Majnaric (1975), 46 Ohio App. 2d 157 at 161 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.