46 Ohio App. 3d 102 - Buckles v. Buckles’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 53 Ohio App. 3d 31 - Birath v. Birath (1988), 106 Ohio App. 3d 571 - Mark v. Mellott Manufacturing Co. (1995)
81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Cherry v. Cherry · Kaechele v. Kaechele · Berish v. Berish · Wolfe v. Wolfe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court enjoys a `large measure of discretion to determine the sufficiency of the evidence, the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given to the testimony.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a] trial court has broad discretion to determine the proper grounds for divorce, and such finding should not be overturned in the absence of any showing that there was an abuse of discretion of such a nature as to * * * prejudicially affect the complaining party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Katju v. Bavadekar · Patel v. Patel“`An equitable result requires that to the extent feasible, each party should enjoy, after termination of a marriage, a standard of living comparable to that established during the marriage as adjusted by the various factors of [R.C. 3105.18 ].'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.