Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Ohio App. 3d 49 - Roesch v. Bray

46 Ohio App. 3d 49 - Roesch v. Bray’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably 70 Ohio App. 3d 226 - Desantis v. Soller (1990), Potti v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1991)

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

9019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 50 Ill. App. 3d 429 - Kemp v. Gannett · McCarty v. Lingham · 84 Ill. App. 3d 710 - Gryb v. Benson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e conclude that these expenses [for maintenance, utilities, and resale] are incidental to ownership. Although appellees might have been able to foresee that certain expenses would be incurred in maintaining the property until future resale, the duration and extent of those expenses could only be speculated upon. Were we to hold otherwise, a breaching party could be subjected to liability for similar expenses for months or even years on end.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It has been held that when the sale of real estate after a breach of contract is made '***within a reasonable time and at the highest price obtainable after the breach, [it] is evidence of the market value on the date of the breach. (Citation omitted.)'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is well established that the proper measure of damages for a breach of a real estate contract is the difference between the original contract price and the fair market value of the property at the time of breach.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.