46 Ohio App. 3d 52 - State v. Harcourt’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 102 Ohio App. 3d 534 - State v. Blankenship (1995), 102 Ohio App. 3d 28 - State v. Braxton (1995)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Maurer · State v. Bridgeman · State v. Williams · State v. Apanovitch · State v. DePew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, of confusion of the issues, or of misleading the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McClarty v. Herzog
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.