46 Ohio App. 3d 63 - Stateo v. Heinrichs’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably 73 Ohio App. 3d 486 - State v. Klein (1991), 93 Ohio App. 3d 586 - State v. Retherford (1994)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · State v. Chatton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Percentagewise, stops or arrests at 4:30 a.m. in residential neighborhoods would probably ferret out many crimes, but in the absence of anything more specific, investigative stops based primarily upon the time of day or night would eventually do violence to the right of every individual to be free from unreasonable restraint or interference. And while it is always tempting to focus on end results when a mere hunch proves correct and guilt is established, the continuing vitality of the freedoms enjoyed by all citizens nonetheless depends upon reasonable adherence to basic procedural restrictions. Here, something more was required in the way of `specific and articulable facts' to justify the detention, and accordingly, the alleged error is well made. See, also, State v. Heinrichs (1988), 46 Ohio App.3d 63 [ 545 N.E.2d 1304 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Weeks at 393. {¶ 38} I begin my analysis with the well recognized rule that a police stop of a motor vehicle is a significant intrusion that requires justification as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.