Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Okla. 254 - De Vry v. De Vry

De Vry v. De Vry’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1947
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1947

9 state decisions

401915192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Franklin v. Franklin · Peretti v. Peretti · Buell v. Buell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contention of the plaintiff in error is that the husband has the right to' choose the domicile of the family, and it is the duty of the wife to accompany and live with him in the home so selected, unless there be good reason for her refusing to do so, and that a failure of the wife so to do is abandonment, authorizing a divorce. There can be no question that this statement of the law is correct. Buell v. Buell. 42 Wash. 277 . 84 Pac. 821 ; Franklin v. Franklin, 190 Mass. 349 , 77 N. E. 48 , 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 145, 5 Ann. Cas. 851; 14 Cyc. 612.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.