Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Okla. 51 - Cummins v. State

Cummins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1981
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1981

8 state decisions

2019151920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And a complaint which fails to state that the mother of such child is a resident of the county in which the action is brought is not sufficient to constitute a cause of action.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Section 625. Comp. Laws 1909 (section 4408, Rev. Laws 1910), must be construed in connection with the constitutional limitation of the jurisdiction of county courts as to amount. The effect of such construction is to read into said section 625, Comp. Laws 1909 (section .4408, Rev. Laws 1910) : ‘Provided that the penalty provided for in said section must not exceed $1,000.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.