Winans v. Hare’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 1989 · most notably New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co. (1939), Beardsley v. Stephens (1928)
1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Citizens Bank of Senath v. Douglass · Strickler v. Gitchel · Roberts v. Fitzallen · Daniels v. Johnson · McClure v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Plaintiffs assign as error, the admitting of certain exhibits in evidence, but the record shows that no exceptions were taken to the ruling of the court in admitting this evidence, and this court cannot therefore consider this assignment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dane v. Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.