Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 OR 267 - Fleishman v. Meyer

Fleishman v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 1938
most recently cited

1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 1938

1 district · 12 state decisions

701905191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Buchanan · Preston v. Hill · Smith v. Delaware Insurance · Anderson v. Adams · Brockley v. Brockley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant can be required to elect on which of several defenses he will rely only where the facts stated therein are so inconsistent that, if the truth of one defense be admitted, it will necessarily disprove another.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.