Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 ORAPP 839 - State v. Mepham

State v. Mepham’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In some cases, some evidence of the presence of an illegal substance may establish probable cause [to believe] that more of the same material will be found. See State v. Krohn, [supra ] * * *. We do not consider this to be such a case. The affidavit does not provide enough facts to warrant the reasonable suspicion that the container was not the house-hold's entire supply." 46 Or. App. at 842 , 613 P.2d 500 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.