Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SO2D 184 - Young v. McKenzie

Young v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2019

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

701950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Orange Belt Packing Co. v. International Agricultural Corp. · Massey v. Pineapple Orange Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he purpose [of a supplemental proceeding] is to aid the holder of a valid and outstanding execution to ferret out what assets the judgment debtor may have or what property of his others may be holding for him, or may have received from him to defeat the collection of the lien or claim, that might be subject to execution.... [A supplemental proceeding is] in the nature of [a] proceeding[ ] in discovery of property which should be made available to the execution. As we see it, [a supplemental proceeding] relate[s] directly to the execution and [is] designed to aid in determining through judicial process what property the defendant may have or others may have for him that could be subjected to the execution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “That sets the machinery in motion which secures to him an examination of the defendant and, if the circumstances warrant it, of others who have been involved in gifts, transfers, or assignments of the defendant’s property. Upon the information so obtained, the judge may order such property in the hands of the judgment debtor himself or others as the evidence justifies to be applied toward the satisfaction of the debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that the `proceedings supplementary' [did] not constitute `an action upon the judgment'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.