Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SO2D 891 - Fote v. Reitano

Fote v. Reitano’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably 82 So. 2d 502 - Potakar v. Hurtak (1955), 294 So. 2d 73 - City of Daytona Beach v. Tona-Rama, Inc. (1974)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

901950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the second place, since reliance upon a false representation is an essential element of the plaintiff's cause of action, the plaintiffs must prove that they were justified in relying upon the false representation, that they did rely upon it, and that they acted in reliance upon it to their injury. 24 Am. Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Section 264, page 98. In measuring their right to rely upon such representation, it has been said that every person must use reasonable diligence for his own protection. * * *"”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is our opinion, therefore, that the plaintiffs failed to prove that they were justified in relying upon the representation alleged to have been made by defendant or that they did, in fact, rely upon it, if, indeed, such misrepresentation could ever have constituted a fraud and hence a basis for rescission. The final decree should be reversed, with directions to the Chancellor to enter a final decree in defendant's favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.