Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SO3D 1081 - Alonzo v. State

Alonzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Melbourne v. State · 753 So. 2d 29 - Rodriguez v. State · 965 So. 2d 1 - Hoskins v. State · 691 So. 2d 1180 - Davis v. State · 3 So. 3d 1108 - Murray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the record fails to identify the respective race of the challenged and unchallenged jurors, the appellate court cannot determine if pretext exists”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.