Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SO3D 1161 - Rivero v. Meister

Rivero v. Meister’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 826 So. 2d 221 - Moakley v. Smallwood · 489 So. 2d 761 - Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Hammock · 994 So. 2d 508 - Shniderman v. Fitness Innovations and Technologies, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here, the trial court did not make an express finding of bad faith conduct. The trial court also did not make any detailed factual findings describing specific acts of bad faith conduct that resulted in the plaintiffs unnecessary incurrence of attorneys’ fees. Instead, the trial court found that the defendants’ attorneys were merely negligent. Because the trial court did not make an express finding of bad faith conduct, we are required to reverse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “DOES THE DEFINITION OF “BAD FAITH CONDUCT” IN MOAKLEY V. SMALLWOOD, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002), INCLUDE RECKLESS MISCONDUCT WHICH RESULTS IN THE UNNECESSARY INCUR-RENCE OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.