46 So. 3d 1221 - Campbell v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 965 So. 2d 1261 - Esaw v. Esaw · 899 So. 2d 1152 - Derrevere v. Derrevere · 555 So. 2d 1309 - Hoffay v. Hoffay · 722 So. 2d 851 - Hamlin v. Hamlin · MacArty v. MacArty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the issues, and the legal skill required; (2) the likelihood that the representation will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (B) the customary fee; (4) the result obtained; (5) the time limitations imposed by the client or circumstances; (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; (7) the experience, reputation and ability of the lawyers; and (8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ortiz v. Ortiz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.