Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 So. 3d 262 - State v. Williams

46 So. 3d 262 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brigham City v. Stuart · 130 S. Ct. 7 - DTD Enterprises, Inc. v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The officer personally observes a driver operating a vehicle in an erratic manner, so as to cause the officer to reasonably believe the driver is impaired and is a danger to the public, and 2. The officer is in a marked vehicle, and 3. The officer gets in contact with an officer having jurisdiction and gets permission to effectuate the stop, and 4. The investigation is conducted by an officer who has jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.