Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SO3D 375 - Moore v. Bailey

Moore v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 558 So. 2d 869 - Tucker v. Hinds County · 700 So. 2d 619 - Russell v. Orr · 594 So. 2d 1170 - Mantachie Nat. Gas v. Miss. Valley Gas Co. · Webb v. Jackson · Ratliff v. Ratliff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a representation (2) that is false (3) and material (4) that the speaker knew was false or was ignorant of the truth (5) combined with the speaker’s intent that the listener act on the representation in a manner reasonably contemplated (6) combined with the listener’s ignorance of the statement’s falsity (7) and the listener’s reliance on the statement as true (8) with a right to rely on the statement, and (9) the listener’s proximate injury as a consequence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.