Armstrong v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1702
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Place · United States v. Jacobsen · Smith v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Importantly, the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies only to cases involving governmental action; it does not apply when the search or seizure was conducted by a private individual.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Oliveras
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.