Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 So. 3d 606

Pierce v. Pierce

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 7, 2010

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-09-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-09-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 8, 2010, the Court has determined that the order on appeal, which denied a motion to enforce a mediated settlement agreement and set aside the agreement upon determining it was signed under duress, is not one which finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a *607probate matter. Thus, the order is not subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this dismissal, all pending motions are denied as moot.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
/46/so3d/606 · .json · Public domain