Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SO3D 756 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Negron v. United States · State v. Dorthey · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · Kliewer v. New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) That the recording device was capable of taking the conversation now offered in evidence. (2) That the operator of the device was competent to operate the device. (3) That the recording is authentic and correct. (4) That changes, additions or deletions have not been made in the recording. (5) That the recording had been preserved in a manner that is shown to the court. (6) That the speakers are identified. (7) That the conversation elicited was made voluntarily and in good faith, without any kind of inducement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.