46 So. 3d 764 - State v. Law’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford · 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A.' It is unlawful for any person who has- been convicted of a crime of violence as defined in R.S, 14:2(B) which is a felony or simple burglary, burglary of a pharmacy, burglary of‘an inhabited dwelling, unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling, felony illegal use of weapons or dangerous instrumentalities, manufacture or possession of a delayed action incendiary device, manufacture or possession of a bomb, or possession of a firearm while in the possession of or during the sale or distribution of. a controlled dangerous substance, or any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous- Substances Law which is a felony,1 or any crime which is defined as a sex offense in R.S. 15:541, or any crime defined as an attempt to commit one of the above-enumerated offenses under the laws of this state, or who has been convicted under the laws of any other state or of the United States or of any foreign government or country of a crime which, if committed in this state, would |7be one of the above-enumerated crimes, to possess a firearm or carry a concealed weapon. C. The provisions of this Section prohibiting the possession of firearms and carrying concealed weapons by persons who have been convicted of certain felonies shall not apply to any person who has not been convicted of any felony for a period of ten years from the date of completion of sentence, probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The test of integral act evidence is not simply whether the state might somehow structure its case to avoid any mention of the uncharged act or conduct, but whether doing so would deprive its case of narrative momentum and cohesiveness, with power not only to support conclusions, but to sustáin the willingness of jurors to draw the inference, whatever they may be, necessary to reach an honest verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.