Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 So. 3d 801 - State v. MacK

46 So. 3d 801 - State v. MacK’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey · 827 So. 2d 488 - State v. Murray · State v. Celestine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While defendant's claim of voluntary drug use raises the possibility of a defense of lack of specific intent (intoxication) as to the attempted second degree murder charges, he waived such an affirmative defense by pleading guilty. Further, the assertion by his attorney that defendant was under the influence of an intoxicating substance at the time of the offense does not negate his admission of guilt or create grounds by which to attack the sufficiency of the evidence. Regardless, the record evinces that defendant's guilty plea was validly entered. Therefore, he is precluded from raising on appeal any issue regarding whether there was sufficient evidence for his conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no court could have concluded that he had the specific intent to kill his victims”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.