Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SW2D 375 - Calvert v. Harris County

Calvert v. Harris County’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1969
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1969

7 state decisions

401932194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Southern Pacific Railroad v. San Francisco Savings Union · Wright v. Austin · City of Leadville v. Bohn Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Lewis, Eminent Domain, Vol. 2 (3rd Ed.) page 1268, we find this statement: ‘When an easement is taken for a Railroad or other public use, the owner of the fee retains title to the minerals with the right to remove them, subject to the right of support for the railroad or whatever may be put upon the land, and to the right of exclusive use of the surface.’ See Southern Pac. R. Co. v. San Francisco Savings Union, 146 Cal. 290 , 79 P. 961, 964 , 70 L.R.A. 221 * * *.” (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It can hardly be that, in every case where a right of way is sought to be condemned over a strip of oil-bearing land, the valuable rights which were owned by the defendant when the condemnation proceedings were inaugurated, and which the condemning party does not acquire, are entirely lost to defendant owning adjoining land by reason of the condemnation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.