Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 SW3D 333 - Buckley v. State

Buckley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 159th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Cockrell v. State · Wyatt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) he has the right to remain silent and not make any statement at all and that any statement he makes may be used against him at his trial; (2) any statement he makes may be used as evidence against him in court; (3) he has the right to have a lawyer present to advise him prior to and during any questioning; (4) if he is unable to employ a lawyer, he has the right to have a lawyer appointed to advise him prior to and during any questioning; and (5) he has the right to terminate the interview at any time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.