Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Tex. Civ. App. 449 - McAllen v. Alonzo

46 Tex. Civ. App. 449 - McAllen v. Alonzo’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1944
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1944

7 state decisions

3019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the peremptory instruction to find for defendants had been warranted by the law and evidence, we would not likely perceive any harm in giving the instruction orally, though the statute requires charges to the jury to be in writing, and it is thought best in every instance'to be governed by it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.