Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 UTAH 116 - Hatch v. Hatch

Hatch v. Hatch’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2007

8 state decisions

301915192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States · Lux v. Haggin · Clinton v. Englebrecht · Botiller v. Dominguez · John Van Ness v. Perez Pacard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nity of man and wife can never be created by law, but by nature; and where there is discord, no legal rules can create harmony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, in the state courts, the statute of limitations applies to equitable as well as legal actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.