Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 VACIR 216 - Morris v. Commonwealth

Morris v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals · W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co. · Snyder-Falkinham v. Stockburger · Wright v. Orlowski · Hayman v. Patio Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The limitation on medical malpractice recoveries contained in Code § 8.01-581.15 does nothing more than establish the outer limits of a remedy provided by the General Assembly. A remedy is a matter of law, not a matter of fact. A trial court applies the remedy’s limitation only after the jury has fulfilled its fact-finding function. Thus, Code § 8.01-581.15 does not infringe upon the right to a jury trial because the section does not apply until after a jury has completed its assigned function in the judicial process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.