46 Vt. 1
Decided August 15, 1873
Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1873-08-15
Book Account. The plaintiffs’ account was for 736 feet of pine boards, at four cents per foot, which they claimed to have sold and delivered to the firm of Belknap & Edson, of which the defendant Belknap was surviving partner, and that the contract of sale was made with the said Edson by the plaintiff Bradish. There was no testimony tending to show that Belknap knew anything about said sale, or that the firm of Belknap & Edson ever had said lumber.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1918
1 state decisions
Relies on Dawson v. Wait
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1873-08-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The opinion of the court was delivered by
¶2The only practical purpose to be served by reporting this case, is to remind the profession that the question involved was considered, discussed, and decided in Dawson, admr. v. Waite, 41 Vt. 626. The court still entertain the same view of the subject.
¶3Judgment affirmed.