Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 WASH 131 - Keith v. Smith

Keith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
8
states following
January 1942
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 1942 · most notably Selvage v. Talbott (1911), Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co. (1913)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

13019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zimmerman v. Zehendner · McCarthy v. Loupe · Shanklin v. Hall · Stout v. Humphrey · Dolan v. O'Toole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the following cases, specified in this section, any agreement, contract and promise shall be void, unless such agreement, contract or promise, or some note or memorandum thereof, be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by some person thereunto by him lawfully authorized, that is to say: . . . (5) An agreement authorizing or employing an agent or broker to sell or purchase real estate for compensation or a commission.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “From its very nature a claim for commission could not be made until earned, and to hold that performance would take an action of this character out of the operation of the statute would nullify the statute itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.