Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Wash. 2d 594 - State v. Kelly

46 Wash. 2d 594 - State v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1973
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. State · State v. Donckers · State v. Peasley · State v. Klein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Each of the words used in this statute upon which a criminal charge can be predicated signifies some form of overt act; the doing or saying of something that either directly or indirectly contributes to the criminal act; some form of demonstration that expresses affirmative action, and not mere approval or acquiescence, which is all that is implied in assent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.