Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Wash. App. 84 - State v. Franklin

46 Wash. App. 84 - State v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2023

15 state decisions

6019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 105 Wash. 2d 175 - State v. Ammons · State v. Sanwick · 100 Wash. 2d 1 - Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. Briggs · 99 Wash. 2d 501 - State v. Caliguri · 92 Wash. 2d 474 - State v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It would be inconsistent with the stated purpose of the SRA to construe the statute so that a defendant who committed a violent felony out of state avoids the imposition of a greater sentence merely because the other state imposes a shorter prison term than would Washington.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]eparate crimes encompassing the same criminal conduct . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"(1) A person is guilty of assault in the second degree if he or she, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first degree: "(a) Intentionally assaults another and thereby recklessly inflicts substantial bodily harm; . . . "(2) Assault in the second degree is a class B felony."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.