Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Wash. App. 92 - State v. Green

46 Wash. App. 92 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2023

9 state decisions

5019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 106 Wash. 2d 525 - State v. Oxborrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Inasmuch as we find the trial court erred in determining the offender's score as legislatively defined and being unable to determine if the court imposed its excessive sentence of approximately twice the standard range depending upon its determination of the offender score, we remand for resentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “other current offense” in computing Mr. Hernandez's sentencing history on the rape conviction. In so doing, the court increased the offender score from 0 to 2, thereby increasing the standard range. Interpretation of the phrase " [sjeparate crimes encompassing the same criminal conduct ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “shall be served concurrently. Consecutive sentences may only be imposed under the exceptional sentence provisions....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.