Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 WIS 516 - Pliemling v. State

Pliemling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
9
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2019

18 state decisions

60187918801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . If the jury were satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt, as they should have been in order to convict him at all, that the defendant was guilty of this horrible deed, then it is quite evident that the verdict was a compromise, of the most unjustifiable if not reprehensible character; and if they were not so satisfied, then the verdict was a wrong and a crime.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . Although the verdict is for an offense included in and less than murder in the first degree, for which the defendant might have been convicted under the information upon sufficient evidence, if unsustained by the evidence and by facts necessary to constitute the offense of murder in the third degree of which he was convicted, the verdict is erroneous, and the judgment must for that reason alone be reversed.” Citing State v. Hammond, 35 Wis. 315 ; State v. Erickson, 45 Wis. 86 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the killing of a human being, without a design to effect death, by a person engaged in the commission of any felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.