Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 WIS 70 - Dodge v. Williams

Dodge v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
September 1979
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1979 · most notably In re Estate of Walkerly (1895), Cowie v. Strohmeyer (1912)

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 73 state decisions — followed in 20 states

24018791880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a will contains a power of sale, not in mandatory terms, but it is apparent, from the general scope and tenor of the will, that the testator intended all his realty to be sold, the power of sale will be held imperative, and the doctrine of equitable conversion applied.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The English doctrine of perpetuities applied to estates both real and personal, and grew up by a series of judicial decisions. Perry on Trusts, secs. 377, 379. It appears to have been applied to private trusts, but not to trusts for charitable uses, which usually are essentially and indefinitely permanent. Perry, secs. 384, 687, 736;””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The statute limiting the rule against perpetuities to realty, manifestly abrogates the English doctrine as applicable to personalty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.