Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Wis. 2d 1 - Schwamb v. State

46 Wis. 2d 1 - Schwamb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anders v. California · Chapman v. State of California · Payne v. Arkansas · State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the court has made detailed findings of facts as was done here, our review of the evidentiary or historical physical facts will be limited to the same review that is used in other factual disputes heard and determined by a trial judge. The findings of the trial court will not be upset unless they are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “. . the admission of a coerced confession cannot be deemed harmless error even in the presence of other evidence which might well have constituted independent proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” (at 14)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`This power is exercised with "some reluctance and with great caution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.