United States v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis
460 F.2d 1287 · 1972
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3806 · 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on Mulloy v. United States · Billings v. Truesdell · United States v. Bender · Chernekoff v. United States · Briggs v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each case has its own facts and the ‘facts’ presented control the decision. Nevertheless, in determining whether a valid III-A prima facie extreme hardship claim is alleged, the following considerations are in order: the degree of need of the claimed dependent; the nature of the need; the extent of the registrant’s contribution to the need; the lack of a viable alternative source of contribution to the dependent’s support; and the degree of distress resulting to dependent from loss of registrant’s contribution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.