United States v. Munchak

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued June 13, 1972.

Decided June 15, 1972.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-06-15

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1982

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on 338 F. Supp. 1283 - United States v. Munchak

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1972-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edward N. Costikyan, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Warren M. Green, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶2Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

¶3Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial is affirmed on the basis of Judge Weinfeld’s opinion below. 338 F.Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y.1972).

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Irving Robert Kaufman
Chief Judge
James Lowell Oakes
Chief Judge
Paul Raymond Hays
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Edward N. Costikyan, New York City (Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Jack C. Auspitz, Warren M. Green, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel J. Sullivan, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.