United States v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
460 F.2d 270 · 1972
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably United States v. Marchand (1977), United States v. Boston (1974)
15 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Earley v. DiCenso · United States ex rel. Phipps v. Foulette · United States v. Fernandez · United States v. Magnotti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““must be considered on its own facts, and that convictions based on eyewitness identification at trial following a pretrial identification by photograph will be set aside on that ground only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.